Friday, April 8, 2011

Unlikely Libya rebels can oust Kadhafi: US general

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


General Carter Ham
© AFP/File Filippo Monteforte
AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A top US general said Thursday it was unlikely that Libyan rebel forces could oust the regime's leader Moamer Kadhafi, saying the conflict appeared to be turning into a stalemate.

General Carter Ham, who led the first stage of the coalition air campaign in Libya, said the international intervention had succeeded in protecting civilians for the most part but that Kadhafi's regime probably would not be removed by military means.

Asked at a Senate hearing about the chances that the opposition could "fight their way" to Tripoli and replace Kadhafi, Ham said: "Sir, I would assess that as a low likelihood."

And when pressed by Senator John McCain whether the situation was essentially a stalemate or an "emerging stalemate," Ham said: "Senator, I would agree with that at present on the ground."

Under tough questioning, the general said a stalemate is "not the preferred solution" in Libya but that outcome appeared "more likely" now than at the outset of the air campaign launched March 19.
But Ham said removing Kadhafi was not part of the UN-mandated mission to protect civilians, and that the US administration wanted to rely on diplomatic and other means to force him to step down.

His comments underscored growing concern in Washington and European capitals that the fight in Libya could be deadlocked, with Kadhafi firmly in control in Tripoli and badly-organized rebels unable to turn the tide even under the cover of NATO-led air power.

France's Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, however, took a more optimistic view, saying Kadhafi's regime would inevitably fall.

"The question today is to know under what conditions Kadhafi goes, not how he's going to be able to hold on to power," Juppe told lawmakers in Paris.

In Washington, McCain and some other members of the Senate Armed Services Committee slammed the Obama administration for taking what they called a half-hearted approach to the war, saying removing Kadhafi should be part of the military mission.

But Ham said the administration wanted to employ diplomacy and sanctions to oust Kadhafi and warned that the United States had tried "regime change" elsewhere before.

"We have some history in trying to apply military force to regime change where we have been less than successful," he said, alluding to Iraq.

The general said it was possible an international ground force might be deployed if and when Kadhafi leaves, but warned that an American presence might trigger a backlash in the region.

"I suspect there might be some consideration of that. My personal view at this point would be that that's probably not the ideal circumstance, again, for the regional reactions that having American boots on the ground would entail."

Amid calls by some senators to arm and train the rebels before it was too late, Ham said that he had "some indication that some Arab nations are in fact starting to do that at present."

But the general expressed caution, saying any effort to supply arms had to be carried out carefully to avoid weapons getting into the hands of extremists.

After edging to within 60 kilometers (37 miles) of Kadhafi's hometown of Sirte on March 28, the rebels have been steadily pushed back almost 400 kilometers by the superior fire power of Kadhafi's forces, despite coalition air strikes.

Ham said bombing raids had undercut the regime's ability to target civilians -- except in the besieged city of Misrata.

The rag-tag rebels are struggling to defend Misrata, Libya's third city, under an onslaught from better armed regime forces.

Ham said Kadhafi had moved tanks and troops into parts of the city and that had made air strikes more difficult to carry out without endangering civilians.

The US military pulled back about 50 combat aircraft this week from the air campaign as NATO took command of the Libya operation.

But Ham said the US AC-130 gunships, which can target tanks and ground targets with powerful guns, were now available to the NATO commander of the air operation if he needed them.

US military leaders had previously said the side-firing AC-130 aircraft, along with other ground-attack planes and fighters, would be withdrawn and placed on standby, pending a request from the NATO alliance.

© AFP -- Published at Activist Post with license



Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Paul Craig Roberts: Why Is NATO Really In Libya? (Video)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

YouTube -- RT

Is NATO failing with its attempts in Libya? Former Reagan Administration official Paul Craig Roberts thinks the situation with Gaddafi is much different than the other recent protests in the Arab world. "Why is NATO there?" has become to real question, says Roberts, who fears that risky involvement stemming from American influence could lead to catastrophic breaking point.




Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Gates: US Libya action does not set a precedent

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


Libyan rebels near Ajbadiya
© AFP/File Odd Andersen
AFP

CAMP MAREZ, Iraq (AFP) - US military action in Libya did not set a precedent for future American intervention in other Middle Eastern countries facing uprisings or unrest, Pentagon chief Robert Gates said on Friday.

"What has made Libya unique is first of all a request, which is unprecedented in my experience, of the Arab League actually asking for an intervention in the Middle East, to take on an Arab government mistreating its own people," the US defence secretary said.

Gates said the Arab League request was then supported by the Gulf Cooperation Council and bolstered by the United Nations and allies such as Britain and France.

"It's hard for me to imagine those kinds of circumstances being replicated any place else," he said during a visit to the Marez Camp US military base in northern Iraq.

After dithering on whether to intervene in Libya to protect insurgents fighting strongman Moamer Kadhafi, the United States led an international coalition that intervened with air power, before handing the lead to NATO.

© AFP -- Published at Activist Post with license





Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Thursday, April 7, 2011

US politico in Libya to meet Kadhafi, seek deal

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


A Libyan rebel fighter scans the horizon in the desert
© AFP Odd Andersen
AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A former US lawmaker with prior dealings with Moamer Kadhafi was in Tripoli Wednesday on a private mission seeking a peace deal that would include the departure of the Libyan strongman.

Curt Weldon, a Republican representative from Pennsylvania from 1987 to 2007, said in a New York Times column that he was in Libya "as the leader of a small private delegation, at the invitation of Colonel Kadhafi's chief of staff and with the knowledge of the Obama administration and members of Congress from both parties."

"Our purpose is to meet with Colonel Kadhafi today and persuade him to step aside," he said.
State Department spokesman Mark Toner said Weldon "did inform us of his plans to travel" to Libya, but added "he's not there on our behalf" and "is not carrying a message" from US President Barack Obama's administration.

"I don't know if it's helpful or unhelpful," Toner told reporters when queried about the impact of his trip. "He's not representing the US government."


Weldon, who in 2004 traveled to Libya as the head of a bipartisan congressional delegation to express support for Kadhafi's decision to give up his country's nuclear weapons, wrote that "there is no question that America should play a critical role in helping the Libyans build a new government."

He argued that both Obama and former US president George W. Bush failed to follow up on promises made in 2004 to help Libya with reforms.

Weldon said he would seek "an immediate United Nations-monitored cease-fire, with the Libyan army withdrawing from contested cities and rebel forces ending attempts to advance."

"The world agrees that Colonel Kadhafi must go, even though no one has a plan, a foundation for civil society has not been constructed and we are not even sure whom we should trust. But in the meantime, the people of Libya deserve more than bombs."

The mission comes as the key Western powers involved in the Libyan conflict were throwing their energies into negotiating a solution, as the war between government and rebel forces dug deeper into a stalemate.

The United States, France and Britain are reaching out to both the rebels and, indirectly, to officials in Kadhafi's regime, looking for a way to bring them together in talks, officials for both sides said.

© AFP -- Published at Activist Post with license




Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Libya war costs $4 million a day: US Air Force

The total cost of the operation for the entire US military was estimated at $500 million on March 28.


© AFP Mahmud Hams
AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The war in Libya is costing the US Air Force $4 million a day but the cost likely will drop now that American fighter jets pulled out of the operation, the air force secretary said Tuesday.

As of Tuesday morning, "we're probably (at) about 75 million dollars for the cost of the operation thus far," said Air Force Secretary Michael Donley, the top civilian overseeing the service.

"And our best estimate was about four million dollars a day."
Speaking to defense reporters in Washington, Donley said the price tag "will probably be adjusted here as the US participation in strike operations has now gone away."

But Donley could not say how much the cost of the operation might be reduced after the withdrawal of US combat aircraft.

About 50 warplanes -- including fighter jets and ground-attack aircraft -- were deployed for combat flights over Libya in the past few days, while the air force has contributed 39 "support aircraft" for refueling, surveillance and other tasks, according to Donley.

He said the "strike" aircraft would return to European bases and remain on standby in case NATO requested help from Washington in the air campaign, launched March 19.

US combat sorties ended at 2200 GMT on Monday as NATO allies take over strike missions, under a UN-mandate to enforce a no-fly zone and protect civilians from the Libyan regime's forces,

The total cost of the operation for the entire US military was estimated at $500 million on March 28.

For relief efforts in Japan after that country's earthquake and tsunami, the air force had spent about $40 million evacuating 5,000-6,000 Americans and about $8-$9 million on humanitarian assistance, including food supplies, Donley said.

The air campaign in Libya and the disaster relief operation in Japan have aggravated mounting financial pressures on the Pentagon, as Congress has yet to approve spending to cover the current fiscal year for the military or the rest of the federal government.

© AFP -- Published at Activist Post with license



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Monday, April 4, 2011

Oil Rises On Market Speculation Over Globalist War in Libya

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


Dees Illustration
Kurt Nimmo
InfoWars

Oil has spiked to a 30-month high on market speculation related to demand and the globalist war against the Libyan regime of Muammar Gaddafi.

Gaddafi’s forces bombed an oil field south of the city of Ajdabiya and heightened concerns about the supply of oil from the African nation.

Crude for May delivery gained around 84 cents and topped $108.78 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It is the highest spike since September 24, when prices hit $108.30 a barrel. Brent oil for May settlement climbed as much as $1.05, or 0.9 percent, to $119.75 a barrel on the London-based ICE Futures Europe exchange.


“It’s becoming increasingly clear that the situation in Libya may be prolonged,” said Christopher Bellew, a senior broker at Bache Commodities Ltd. in London, told Bloomberg. “The more one looks at uprisings in the Middle East, the more one realizes they will not be easy to resolve. At the same time, oil demand is relatively inelastic to higher prices.”

Oil has climbed 28 percent since American and British intellignece prompted a rag tag gang of Gaddafi opponents to take up arms against the Libyan government.

Mark Pervan, head of commodity research at Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. in Melbourne, told Bloomberg upcoming elections in Nigeria may also impact oil prices. A vote to elect lawmakers was rescheduled on April 2. More than 50 people have died in election-related violence since July, according to Amnesty International. Nigeria is Africa’s most populous nation and largest oil producer.

Last week a leading neocon responsible for the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans and the lies that led the United States into an undeclared war against Iraq – and ultimately led to the murder of nearly 1.5 million Iraqis – told Fox News it is irrelevant who controls the flow of oil. Douglas Feith said despite who controls the oil in Libya or elsewhere in the Middle East, governments will be obliged to sell it on the international market.


Neocon Douglas Feith is not worried about the oil supply

Feith admitted that conflict does interrupt the production of oil and impact prices. He did not discount the possibility that the CIA created terror group al-Qaeda may eventually control oil.

A former leader of an al-Qaeda linked group in Libya claims that there are around 1000 fundamentalist Islamic fighters in the country that have joined the uprising against Gaddafi.

The plan to invade Iraq and oust the former CIA operative Saddam Hussein and replace him with former Petra Bank chairman Ahmed Chalabi began well before a neocon-dominated Pentagon decided to invade the oil producing country enfeebled by more than a decade of brutal economic sanctions.

Kurt Nimmo is the editor of Infowars.com and author of Another Day in the Empire.


Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

The Non-War Illusion

NATO air strike on Libya / USA Watchdog image
Greg Hunter
USA Watchdog

The President and his supporters are going to great lengths to make it appear the military operation in Libya is not a war.  Deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes called the NATO bombing in Libya “kinetic military action,” but not war. President Obama is also going out of his way to send the message that this is not an American led operation.  A week ago, in a nation-wide address, Mr. Obama said he was handing over control to our European allies,“. . . because of this transition to a broader NATO based coalition the risks and cost of this operation to our military and American taxpayers will be reduced significantly.” I don’t see how Mr. Obama knows how much this will reduce the cost of this war if there is no clear plan or goal.

The Obama administration doesn’t even know who they are helping to unseat Gadhafi in the Libya War.  The President’s own former national security advisor, General Jim Jones, said yesterday, “We don’t know exactly who the opposition is.” General Jones appeared on ABC’s “This Week” with Christiane Amanpour.  She said, “The United States is making a great fanfare about now giving over to NATO, but you are a former NATO commander.  NATO for all intents and purposes is an American organization.  It’s run by an American commander, the chain of command is American, the biggest command and control and resources are American.  This is still an American led operation, right?” And sticking to the Obama administration script, General Jones replied, “I’m not sure I agree with that. . . in the sorties that are being flown now . . . it’s roughly 50/50 and it’s going to go down to where the Americans are going to be supporting and reconnaissance, search and rescue, intelligence and refueling and things like that.” (Click here to see the complete ABC Amanpour interview.)

Read Full Article

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Libya more 'vital' to Europe than US: Obama ex-advisor

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


Robert Gates: Libya is "not a vital interest (to the United States) in the sense that it affects the vital security of the nation," and "It is more in the vital interest of Europeans... when you consider the effects of massive immigration, the effects of terror, the oil market."

Dees Illustration
AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The Libya endgame is more "vital" to Europe than the United States, a former White House adviser said Sunday, and urged Arab and African allies to step up as Washington slims its role in the conflict.

Retired general James Jones, who until last October served as President Barack Obama's national security adviser, acknowledged on Sunday talk shows that strongman Moamer Kadhafi's ouster was the ultimate goal in the military campaign, but said there was little clarity on how that will be accomplished.

With the UN-approved military strikes against Kadhafi's forces in their third week, the Pentagon has stepped back from a leadership role in the air campaign, stressing it does not want to engage in yet another major war.
Libya is "not a vital interest (to the United States) in the sense that it affects the vital security of the nation," he told ABC News program "This Week."

"It is more in the vital interest of Europeans... when you consider the effects of massive immigration, the effects of terror, the oil market."

European countries, led by Italy, France and Germany, are the top consumers of Libyan crude, and total Libyan output amounts to less than two percent of world production.

A US-led coalition launched the first air strikes against Libya, but NATO began to take command of the air bombing operations last Wednesday.

"What we're doing here is making sure that our allies also take on their share of responsibilities, which they are," Jones told CNN's "State of the Union" program.

He said the United States was still flying "about 50 percent of the missions," but mostly in support roles such as search and rescue and refueling.

The Arab world and Africa, players who "have much more influence on Kadhafi than we do," must now step up, said Jones, who praised the involvement of nations such as Qatar, the first Arab state to fly sorties over Libya to enforce a no-fly zone.

Some Arab nations have been targeted for criticism for standing on the sidelines in the Libya crisis.

"The participation of the Arab League in this mission I think is hugely important, and the African Union has to step up also. This is their neighborhood, and they need to play a major role in how this is going to work out," Jones said.

While Washington has insisted its involvement in Libya, where Kadhafi forces were threatening a bloodbath in rebel-held eastern cities, was meant to avert a humanitarian disaster, Jones said the true goal was the ouster of Kadhafi.

Exactly how that is accomplished has been a point of debate, and Jones appeared to reflect the growing frustration over the best way to achieve such a goal.

"We know that the ultimate -- the end state -- is to have regime change in Libya. And how you get there from where we are now... without the partitioning of Libya, without Kadhafi staying in power for a long period of time, that is the problem," he told CNN.

"But unfortunately, most people want perfect clarity in a situation where clarity doesn't exist."

© AFP -- Published at Activist Post with license



Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Gerald Celente Special Report About "The First Great War of the 21st Century" (Video)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

YouTube -- theeastwatch




Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Supply Chain War (Charlie McGrath Video)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

YouTube -- crabbydogtrix



Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

‘War for Libyan oil planned long ago, no one cares about people’ (Video)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

YouTube -- RT


Susan Lindauer, a journalist and author specializing on American interventions, has never believed the allied forces intervened in Libya out of humanitarian reasons. It is a war for oil which was prepared long ago, Lindauer argues - anyone who cared about the Libyan people would stop immediately. 


Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Sunday, April 3, 2011

US senators seek to force Libya vote

US Sen. Rand Paul
© AFP/Getty Images/File Chip Somodevilla
AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Two senators concerned about US military strikes on Libya warned Friday they aimed to force a vote on whether President Barack Obama has the authority to wage war without congressional approval.

"We believe the answer is that he does not," Republican Senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee said in a letter to Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Paul and Lee said they would block legislation pending in the Senate until Reid schedules a debate and vote on a resolution offered by Paul that states Obama "does not have the power to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve an actual or imminent threat to the nation."
"While we realize there are other matters the Senate had planned to work on, it is our belief that there is very little we are doing that rises to the level of a constitutional question regarding war," they wrote.

"We do not take this responsibility lightly, and we believe the Senate is abdicating its responsibility at this very moment," they said in the letter, which Paul's office made public.

"The bombing and military action against the Libyan government will be two weeks old by the time we return to session next week. That means congressional debate on this war is two weeks overdue," they said.

Jon Summers, a spokesman for Reid, said the Obama administration had done a "good job of consulting with Congress and conveying as much information to us as is possible."

"Further, the Senate has had hearings and briefings, which Senators Paul and Lee have been invited to attend, throughout the week to carefully examine the effectiveness of our operations, and will continue to do so as operations continue," he said.

The US Constitution reserves to Congress the right to declare war, though US presidents have often deployed forces without first getting lawmakers' explicit say-so, despite a 1973 law that aimed to curtail their ability to do so.

The War Powers Act allows the president to use force in response to an attack on the United States, its territories, or its armed forces, but calls for notifying Congress within 48 hours and says US troops must start to withdraw 60 days later unless specifically authorized to remain by lawmakers.

© AFP -- Published at Activist Post with license



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Exposed: The US-Saudi Libya deal

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


Arab League/Wikimedia image
Pepe Escobar
Asia Times

You invade Bahrain. We take out Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. This, in short, is the essence of a deal struck between the Barack Obama administration and the House of Saud. Two diplomatic sources at the United Nations independently confirmed that Washington, via Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, gave the go-ahead for Saudi Arabia to invade Bahrain and crush the pro-democracy movement in their neighbor in exchange for a “yes” vote by the Arab League for a no-fly zone over Libya – the main rationale that led to United Nations Security Council resolution 1973.

The revelation came from two different diplomats, a European and a member of the BRIC group, and was made separately to a US scholar and Asia Times Online. According to diplomatic protocol, their names cannot be disclosed. One of the diplomats said, “This is the reason why we could not support resolution 1973. We were arguing that Libya, Bahrain and Yemen were similar cases, and calling for a fact-finding mission. We maintain our official position that the resolution is not clear, and may be interpreted in a belligerent manner.”

As Asia Times Online has reported, a full Arab League endorsement of a no-fly zone is a myth. Of the 22 full members, only 11 were present at the voting. Six of them were Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) members, the US-supported club of Gulf kingdoms/sheikhdoms, of which Saudi Arabia is the top dog. Syria and Algeria were against it. Saudi Arabia only had to “seduce” three other members to get the vote.

Translation: only nine out of 22 members of the Arab League voted for the no-fly zone. The vote was essentially a House of Saud-led operation, with Arab League secretary general Amr Moussa keen to polish his CV with Washington with an eye to become the next Egyptian President.

Read Full Article

Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

US Fed loaned Libya-backed bank billions

Dees Illustration
AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The Federal Reserve lent a Libyan state-backed bank billions of dollars during the financial crisis, documents made public on Thursday have revealed.

The Arab Bank Corporation, which is today 59.3 percent owned by the Libyan government, borrowed in slices as big as $1.175 billion from the US central bank.

At the time the bank was not majority owned by the Tripoli government; other shareholders included the Kuwait Investment Authority and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority.
The Bahrain-headquartered firm appears frequently in the Fed's records of its emergency short-term lending facilities between March 2009 and March 2010.


Since then the United States has slapped sanctions on the Libyan regime and sought to isolate Moamer Kadhafi and his top lieutenants.

The Arab Bank Corporation, which is chaired by the head of Libya's state investment fund, however is not subject to Libyan sanctions.

But some US lawmakers were incredulous about the Fed lending to the Libyan-government backed banks.

Democrat-allied Senator Bernie Sanders said the Fed made "46 emergency, low-interest loans" to the bank, providing a total of $26 billion in credit, though not at one time.

"It is incomprehensible to me that while creditworthy small businesses in Vermont and throughout the country could not receive affordable loans, the Federal Reserve was providing tens of billions of dollars in credit to a bank that is substantially owned by the Central Bank of Libya."

The Fed records show huge numbers of short-term liquidity loans made to American banks and the US units of banks from all over the world at the peak of the financial crisis, many for far larger sums.

A New York unit of the French-Belgian bank Dexia, which had huge potential liabilities in guarantees on municipal bonds, garnered loans for as much as $33.5 billion.

© AFP -- Published at Activist Post with license



Invest In Silver American Eagles Now


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Friday, April 1, 2011

Libya's rag-tag rebels badly need training: US

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Editor's Note: Translation: We need to dedicate more money and more time to this third war front.

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates (L) and Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen testify
© AFP Saul Loeb
AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) - US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday Libya's rag-tag rebels needed training more than guns in their battle against Moamer Kadhafi's army but that other nations should do the job.

Facing lawmakers concerned that armed intervention in Libya could end in stalemate, Gates and top military officer Admiral Mike Mullen said a NATO-led air campaign had damaged Kadhafi's forces but not yet brought them to a breaking point.

Gates said the military mission did not call for deposing Kadhafi but he said economic and political pressure and Libya's people -- not air strikes -- would eventually drive Kadhafi from power.
With the outgunned opposition in retreat, the United States and its allies were now looking at how to assist the makeshift force, with weapons or other help, Gates said.


The Pentagon chief described the rebels as a "disparate," improvised force that had a supply of small arms seized at regime depots but sorely lacked military leadership.

"What they really need is training, command and control and some coherent organization," Gates told the House Armed Services Committee.

He said training "requires advisers on the ground, as would more sophisticated weapons in terms of training them on how to use those weapons."

But Gates, insisting on a limited US role, said other countries could and should provide the training and assistance instead of the United States.

"The truth is in terms of providing that training, in terms of providing that assistance to them, frankly, there are many countries that can do that.

"That's not a unique capability of the United States and as far I'm concerned someone else should do that," he said.

Mullen said the United States was still weighing whether to arm and train the rebels, but agreed that other governments -- including some Arab countries -- could carry out the task.

A detailed picture of the rebels was still hard to come by, and the US government had biographical information for only a handful of leaders in the east, Gates said.

"We really don't know very much about what I think is a very disparate, disaggregated opposition to Kadhafi," he said.

His comments on the rebels came as US media reported CIA operatives were on the ground making contact with the opposition and amid speculation British and French intelligence and special forces' officers had started helping the opposition.

Gates, a former CIA director who led efforts to arm Afghan fighters against Soviet forces in the 1980s, declined to comment on the spy agency's work in Libya.

Admiral Mullen, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, told the same hearing about 20 to 25 percent of Kadhafi's military had been knocked out by coalition bombing but "that does not mean he's about to break from a military standpoint."

Kadhafi's army -- equipped with tanks and heavy guns on the ground -- still enjoyed a major edge over the rebels, said Mullen, estimating a "ten to one ratio" in favor of the regime.

Lawmakers voiced concerns about the risk of an open-ended war, complained the White House had failed to consult them in advance and worried whether the Libyan leader could still be standing when the dust settles.

 "I just don't see how this ends," said Senator Susan Collins.

With NATO now in command, the US military's involvement would in a matter of days "significantly ramp down," Gates said, repeating a vow of "no American boots on the ground."

Gates said the coalition air campaign launched March 19 was designed to protect civilians and not to remove Kadhafi, but suggested the strikes would steadily squeeze the regime.

He said Kadhafi's inner circle would be forced to choose whether to stick by him or save themselves as NATO bombing gradually decimates the regime's army.

"In my view, the removal of Colonel Kadhafi will likely be achieved over time through political and economic measures and by his own people," he said.

As lawmakers voiced concerns about the rebels whose political stance remained unclear, Gates pushed back, saying what was important was the threat posed by Kadhafi.

With popular unrest sweeping the region, Arab countries and European allies had backed military intervention because of Kadhafi's "potential for disrupting everything in the Middle East right now," he said.

© AFP -- Published at Activist Post with license




Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner