Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Susan Lindauer Interview: Illegal War In Libya Is CIA Run, Media Shills Cover For Obama!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

YouTube -- NotForSale2NWO



Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Friday, April 1, 2011

Obama vs. Dancing With The Stars

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


Dees Illustration

Brandon Turbeville

If anyone thought the President’s speech defending the attack on Libya was broadcast a bit earlier than other Presidential speeches in the past, it might surprise you to know that you were right. When scheduling a time for the speech to be televised, the White House consulted with television networks as it normally does.

However, this time around, a conscious decision was made to broadcast before 8pm. Why? Because 8 p.m. is primetime and broadcasting at 8 p.m. would have coincided with “Dancing With the Stars.” I’m not kidding. This was reported by USA Today, CNN, and ABC News Radio.

Just in case you don’t believe it, CNN reports: 
As for the timing of President Obama’s Libya speech Monday night, the New York Times’ Bill Carter reports that the White House scheduled it around network shows, including ABC’s ‘Dancing With the Stars.’ In the end, all involved agreed on 7:30 p.m. ET, which meant the speech would end before ABC’s hit show – among other programs on NBC, CBS, and FOX, to name a few.
There is really no way to look at this decision in a positive light. The best possible scenario is that Americans are so addicted to brain cell murdering programs like “Dancing With the Stars” that they simply have no time or interest in watching a speech by a President who has no real connection to them and is only there to give them the party line on an agenda that they have no control over. That’s actually the best view I can think of, because at least it implies that the American people are aware that their government is unresponsive to anything they have to say.However, another more frightening view (the one that I take) is that our controllers are aware of this. They know that regardless of what is going on in the world or how it affects them, Americans are quite content to sit on their couches growing bigger and dumber with each passing hour. They know that rather than forcing themselves to form an opinion on an issue such as the new Libyan war, they would rather watch a ridiculous show where washed-up celebrities do things they would otherwise never do except for the fact that their careers are almost over and they need whatever money they can get at the time.

Our controllers know that while bombs fall on innocent Libyan civilians, Americans will not raise so much as a finger to stop it because they are too busy immersing themselves in trivia and the subconscious desire to watch famous people fail. That is, after all, the only thing we have left in this country -- the ability to watch others self-destruct so that we can feel a little better about our own lives. Of course, this saccharine version of self-respect only lasts as long as the program. Eventually we all have to get on with our dull, boring, and generally non-productive existence.

Indeed, our controllers know this quite well because it is the system they created. For those who are afraid that our society is in danger of becoming something out of Orwell’s 1984 or Huxley’s Brave New World, I have some very disappointing news -- it already has.

Our culture has degenerated into such a state where government officials and the mainstream media can now launch wars under the most outlandish methods of justification using recycled scare tactics based on interchangeable villains without the general public even noticing.

America is now involved in five wars and, realistically speaking, the average American would never be able to list all of them. Neverthless, it began with Afghanistan and the official fairy tale of 9/11   and Osama bin Laden. It then shifted to Iraq and bin Laden, which shifted into Iraq and WMDs, which, years later, shifted yet again to WMDs and bad intelligence. No doubt Americans are still convinced CIA-front “al-Qaeda” was involved, even though the US government doesn’t even try to hold this line anymore.

We then moved to “terrorists” crossing the border in Pakistan to Afghanistan, which justified the US murder of civilians in this country. Likewise, under the false pretenses of “al-Qaeda” operatives in Yemen and Somalia, the United States has been dropping bombs on these countries as well.

Now, in Libya, a fifth front has emerged. Unfortunately, the general American public having been bombarded by a myriad of boogeymen to be afraid of, has now reached the levels of being constantly so afraid that they can now be completely controlled by this fear. Yet, in the midst of it, they remain unable to articulate exactly what they are afraid of. In their minds, the term “terrorism” not only conjures images of Osama bin Laden and Muslim fundamentalists, but of all Middle Eastern countries (except Israel), American militias, anyone who speaks out against their government’s actions or doesn’t conform to narrow societal standards, plagues, flu, economic collapse, unemployment, and even the prospect of death itself. Logic no longer plays a part, if it ever did, in the culture of fear in which we now exist.

Intellectually, we have fallen so far as a nation that we cannot even describe the boogeyman Osama bin Laden and the fairy tales fed to us by our mainstream media and government controllers. We cannot even describe the details of exactly why Ghadaffi is such an evil man. In 2011, all that is needed is that the ever present channel of fear be tapped in to with a few mentions of “terrorism,” “al-Qaeda,” “extremists,” or “national security,” and the American people willingly rush off to war with little or no idea of what exactly they are rushing off to fight.

This is why a new war has been launched in Libya which is both illegal and immoral, a massive cost to the taxpayer, an act of blatant aggression, and the most obviously unconstitutional military action in American history with barely a peep from the citizenry.

Nevertheless, President Obama certainly walked a fine line Monday night. Indeed, he showed courage rarely expressed by American Presidents. Obama chose to present himself before the American people on the same night that “Dancing With the Stars” was scheduled to go on. One false move could have spelled disaster for him, as the President would have clashed with other, more fun, forms of entertainment. His plan could have backfired. His speech could have run too long. “Dancing With the Stars” could have been interrupted and, if that had happened, we might have finally seen a revolt in this country.

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Mullins, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University where he earned the Pee Dee Electric Scholar’s Award as an undergraduate. He has had numerous articles published dealing with a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, and civil liberties. He also the author of Codex Alimentarius - The End of Health Freedom.



Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Qaddafi Retaking Libya



Rebels holding up the colonial flag of Libya, the ironic 
symbol of this latest round of Western-backed unrest.
Tony Cartalucci, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

It appears Colonel Qaddafi has begun retaking Libya from globalist-backed rebels with Libyan forces now bearing down on the eastern city of Brega. It is also being reported that Qaddafi is offering rebels amnesty if they put down their weapons and take down the colonial Libyan flag that has been flying over "liberated cities" since the London based opposition declared their "Day of Rage" on February 17, 2011.

The schizophrenic corporate-owned media cannot seem to decide whether the rebels are "pleading" for foreign intervention or refusing it; apparently undecided whether revealing openly the globalists' hands in overthrowing a sovereign nation is better than another "Bay-of-Pigs" scenario playing out. Qaddafi's defiance is setting a precedence that endangers the entire premise of globalization and the "legitimacy" it uses to meddle in the affairs of sovereign nations. By confronting this foreign orchestrated uprising, identifying the rebels as pawns of Western ambition, and offering the rebels amnesty even as the tide has decidedly turned in the Libyan government's favor, Qaddafi leaves the official narrative given by the West in humiliating tatters.



It should be further noted that the prevailing western-backed regimes emerging from the recent Arab unrest, including Tunisia, Egypt,and the unscathed western foot-stool of Saudi Arabia are attempting to promote an "Arab League" endorsed no-fly zone. This is perhaps a trial run for the so-called "united front against Iran" many geopolitical analysts believe this unrest has been designed to create. After unabashedly admitting to funding, fueling, and supporting the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt, Hillary Clinton made a visit to Egypt and Tunisia to "consult with Libya's neighbors on possible next steps against Gadhafi."

Unfortunately for the globalists, time is running out and the reality on the ground in Libya is now running contra to the hype and propaganda promoted during the initial stages of Libyan unrest.

Japanese nuclear power-plant explosion: as a real unprecedented
humanitarian disaster unfolds, the globalists still insist on giving
priority to their various rackets and geopolitical gambits. This is
the true face of "globalization" and "global governance."

Further compounding the globalists' plight is the very real disaster unfolding in Japan, and the absolute necessity to respond and direct international assistance and resources to the Japanese. Further meddling in Libya, or in the Middle East in general, with the unprecedented disaster of Japan in the foreground, reveals the full depravity and illegitimacy of the "international system" the globocrat banking and corporate oligarchy are attempting to establish.

As information continues to expose the premeditated and Western-backed nature of the "Arab Spring," wasting time and money on contrived non-humanitarian disasters while a real disaster is unfolding off the east coast of Japan speaks volumes of the true nature and priorities of Western "leadership" and globalization in general.

Tony Cartalucci's articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own atLand Destroyer. 

Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner
order non hybrid seeds

Monday, March 14, 2011

Report: Internet usage transforming news industry



Dees Illustration
Yahoo/AP

NEW YORK – The rapid growth of smartphones and electronic tablets is making the Internet the destination of choice for consumers looking for news, a report released Monday said.

Local, network and cable television news, newspapers, radio and magazines all lost audience last year, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a research organization that evaluates and studies the performance of the press. News consumption online increased 17 percent last year from the year before, the project said in its eighth annual State of the News Media survey.

The percentage of people who say they get news online at least three times a week surpassed newspapers for the first time. It was second only to local TV news as the most popular news platform and seems poised to pass that medium, too, project director Tom Rosenstiel said. Local TV news has been the most popular format since the 1960s, when its growth was largely responsible for the death of afternoon newspapers, he said.

"It was a milestone year," he said.

Read Full Article




Enter your email address to subscribe to our newsletter:


Delivered by FeedBurner
http://f039cfqdfmlhl2bh27xjwoj63a.hop.clickbank.net/?tid=GPA

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

NY Times: Japan Is, Like, So Weird

On Saturday on my way back to New York I picked up a New York Times at the Providence Amtrak station. I know Saturday newspapers are less read but the silliness on the front page cannot go without comment. Two articles about Japan that day were:

"Fearing Crime, Japanese Wear the Hiding Place" on the front page, written by Martin Fackler.

and

"A Font of Commentary Amid Japan's Taciturn Royals" was Saturday's profile, written by Norimitsu Onishi.

What is the average reader to make of this country Japan?

The hiding place article describes a Japanese clothing maker who fashions outfits to resemble vending machines and mailboxes so Japanese can hide from criminals. Notice the headline is "Japanese wear the hiding place" just like ninjas. Is this ninja behavior a widespread trend? No. Although the designer has sold only 20 costumes, it merits a front page article. The point of the piece? The designer "said that while her ideas might be fanciful, Japan’s willingness to indulge the imagination was one of its cultural strengths." I can picture the Times editors fishing for a point.

The royals article profiled Japan's Prince Tomohito of Mikasa. Onishi portrays the prince as an alcoholic nihilistic recluse. The prince's duty? "The royals, he said, could fulfill their duties simply by 'waking up in the morning, eating breakfast, eating lunch, eating dinner, then going to sleep, repeating that 365 days a year.'" I don't know many people in Japan who know or talk about the prince. But I know people were reading these articles because they were both among the top ten most emailed list on Sunday. The oddball stereotype of Japan is alive and well.

Now, I understand that these two fluff pieces are meant to entertain. They were a lot of fun, but I could put them in context because of my firsthand experience with Japan. I also find it ironic that one of the themes of the Brown University conference I was returning from was that mainstream media treats its readers like simpletons. (If you want to read quality reporting in English about Japan, read Sebastian Moffett of the Wall Street Journal.) It makes me worry about the countries I don't know much about. Can I trust newspapers to give me an accurate portrayal?

I just hope newspapers aren't creating a nation of Vinnie Barbarinos, the TV personality famous for his insight, "It's like so weird."